Amp damping factor?


OK need some technical info. I was told by a reputable source that I should buy an amp that had a high damping factor >100 and preferably closer to 150-200. In looking at this in the specs for many units it seems this might be over-rated. I have been looking at some vintage Mac gear and their numbers are like 10-40? Is that an age thing and modern equipment is just that much better? Or is there a tradeoff I dont know about?
joekapahulu
Thanks Kijanki, Larryi and Almarg. The Atma-Sphere white paper was particularly interesting and helpful. Al's advice concerning matching amps with speakers now makes sense. In particular, I can see why DF may be a bit of a red herring. But I think there may be a practical problem with the other very good advice posted above. That is knowing how to research which amps and speakers match well.

For example, when I spoke with ARC a while back, the folks were not familiar with Paradigm Signature speakers. At the same time, when I spoke with the Paradigm tech folks some time ago, they were not very familiar with ARC tube gear.

Now to my ear, my Paradigm/ARC combo sounds ok, but is it really a good match? Am I really getting the best sound possible out of the combo? How can I really know? Let's face it, it's not practical to schlep a 62lb tube amp around with me when I audition speakers. At the same time, a dealer may not be driving his portfolio of speakers with a tube amp, but rather a SS amp -- which is often the case.

Can one say that if a speaker has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms, there should be a good speaker/tube-amp match? Is speaker efficiency a relevant factor? Any other good rules of thumb that might provide helpful guidance? Just thinking out loud, maybe the best thing to do is to call the speaker manufacturer and ask if a particular speaker matches well to a "power paradign" amp and/or a "voltage paradigm" amp.

Thanks again guys!
Can one say that if a speaker has a nominal impedance of 8 ohms, there should be a good speaker/tube-amp match? Is speaker efficiency a relevant factor? Any other good rules of thumb that might provide helpful guidance?
Bifwynne, it's probably not possible to give a reasonably simple all-purpose answer to your question, because there are many variables involved. It is probably fair to say that a LOOSE correlation exists between higher nominal impedance + higher efficiency and suitability for use with a tube amp. However, a more telling factor is often the impedance vs. frequency curve of the speaker.

Keep in mind that an amp having low output impedance, such as most solid state amps, will supply current into a given load impedance that to a close approximation (and assuming the amp is operated within its limits) increases in direct proportion to a reduction in load impedance, while the voltage it outputs will be essentially unaffected by load impedance. Therefore if speaker impedance goes down at some frequencies, power delivery at those frequencies will increase (Power = Voltage x Current, oversimplifying slightly). An amp having high output impedance, such as most tube amps, will not behave that way, and it's power delivery will vary to a lesser degree as load impedance varies.

In general, the flatter the curve (i.e., the less variation of impedance with frequency), the more likely it is to be a good match for a tube amp. There are some exceptions to that, such as electrostatic speakers, which commonly have impedances that decline to very low values in the upper treble, and which are often much better matches to tube amps than to solid state amps. The low output impedance of a solid state amp would cause it to deliver more power into that lower impedance than a tube amp with higher output impedance would deliver, causing the upper treble to be over-emphasized with that kind of speaker.

At the other extreme, many dynamic speakers have low impedances in the bass region, and higher impedances in the mid-range and treble. That can sometimes be an indication that the speaker is intended for use with a solid state amp, where the designer is counting on increased power delivery into the low impedance to reinforce the bass.

I couldn't find an impedance curve for the Paradigm Signature S8 v2 which you indicated in another thread that you are using, but I'll assume it is similar to the curve for the earlier version of the speaker, shown near the bottom of this page.

As you'll see, the impedance curve is anything but flat. It ranges from about 3 ohms in a lot of the bass region, to a 21 ohm peak in the mid-range, and is in the general vicinity of 8 ohms in most of the treble region. That would indicate that in comparison to a solid state amp, a tube amp would de-emphasize the bass, emphasize the mid-range significantly, and provide some de-emphasis of the treble, but to a lesser degree than the bass.

Another thing to watch out for, in the plot of impedance phase angle, is highly capacitive phase angles (i.e., angles that are significantly less than 0, approaching say 40 degrees or so), that occur at frequencies where the impedance is low. The S8 has that combination in the area of 60Hz. That results in the amplifier having to supply relatively large amounts of current at that frequency. I suspect that would not be a problem for your VS115, but it might be for some less powerful tube amps.

Your VS115, btw, has a damping factor of 8, corresponding to an output impedance of 1 ohm on its 8 ohm tap. So the effects I have described would be smaller in degree than in the case of many other tube amps that have higher output impedances. A way of reducing those effects further, if you find it to be sonically preferable, would be to use the 4 ohm taps. That would provide an output impedance of 0.5 ohms, although maximum power capability would be reduced significantly.

Hope that helps,
-- Al
Bifwynne, I did some quick calculations to provide a quantitative perspective on the effects I described above. In comparison to an amp having negligibly small output impedance, the 1 ohm output impedance of the 8 ohm taps on your amp will result in an emphasis of the mid-range frequencies for which the speaker has an impedance approaching 21 ohms, relative to bass frequencies where speaker impedance is around 3 ohms, of about 2db.

Using the 4 ohm taps would reduce the 2db figure to about 1.1db, although it would significantly reduce maximum power capability, as I indicated.

Regards,
-- Al
Al: Thanks very very much. I'll try using the 4 Ohm tap and see what happens. I'll report back in a couple of days to let you know how the 4 Ohm tap worked out. BIF
One point NOT addressed so far is that of phase angle.
When voltage leads or lags current, power to the speaker is compromised.
Tube amps do not like capacitive loads, either.

Sensitivity, while important, may in some cases be trumped by a phase.
A high sensitivity speaker with a huge phase angle will still not be proper for a tube amp. OTOH, a low sensitivity speaker which is a moderate load, can and does sound fine with tubes. Harbeth comes to mind.

To the extent that compatibility can be decided without listening to a given combination, I'd avoid big impedance swings and low impedance coupled with high phase angles at particular frequencies when using tube amps.