2. amps-preamps
  3. 1252252651

Mark Levinson 23.5: camac or RCA?

Hi,

I just bought a 23.5 and I have camac connecors. My interconnects are RCA to RAC Audioquest Colorado (I do not want to change them).

1) IYO, should I convert the camac to RCA connectors on the amp.?

1b) what type of RCA would you suggest (I generally like WBT products-would it be a good choice in this case)?

2) If I keep the camac, should I modify my Colorado the make it a RCA to Camac cable?

My preamp is a Conrad Johnson pv14sl2

My source is a AudioNote DAC 2.1B.

I like all kinds of music.

Thank you very much in advance for your help.

Pierre
spacer
tabl10s's avatar
tabl10s
1,073 posts
 
The 23.5 was all RCA IIRC. I've had Camac's adapter's($60 ea)when I had cables that were half-n-half. Adapter's are like second-class citizen's.
microstrip
180 posts
 
The original Lemo adapter sold by Mark Levinson is very well built and will not degrade the signal more than the thousand tweaks you are not using in your system :-) . IMHO using the adapter is better than re-terminating the cable with Lemo connectors that usually are not suitable for thick audio interconnects.
Anything you change can degrade performance, but the real question is how much?
moemoney's avatar
moemoney
158 posts
 
If you check the Manual for the 23.5 you will see that they state you should do it the way I stated above, also from what I remember regarding the 23.5 that amp did not come with Camac connectors, but I could be wrong. its been a long time since I had that amp but I do know Krell (which is my present amp)does it the same way. and I think Ayre amps as well.
spacer OP
49 posts
 
So, Moemoney,

in this case I think my best bet would be to replace the camac with RCA'S ON THE AMP, if I want to keep my Colorado's - since Microchip says they are not suitable for conversion (and I agree).

Is the replacement of the camac with RCA's the solution whuch will give me the bst sound possible? - I'm not ready to make a compromise let say to keep the amp. as is, or because it is "too much trouble" to make a change that will have "just" a minimal negative effect (there is no such thing as a "minimal negative")
spacer OP
49 posts
 
Tab110s,

so you listened to the 23.5 with RCAs and camac and you are saying the RCA were sounding better?
More to discover