Refurbish a classic amp or replace it?


I have a Mark Levinson ML3 amplifier that is over 20 years old. It sounds great in my system and I am considering whether to have it refurbished/upgraded. I spoke to one place that only does service and upgrades and was told not to do it and that I should sell the ML3 and use the money (plus a lot more)to buy a new amp instead. If I buy a new amp, it would probably be a Pass Labs. I would like to hear from other members who have had similar experiences. Also, I would appreciate recommendations for where to have the ML3 refurbished/upgraded if I decide to go that route. Thanks
dchazen
I think it depends on the amp and the manufacturer. Some amps have "classic" status and some brands have better customer service and reputation. Since their take over of Harmon has not garnered much praise here for their handling of ML gear. Having classic gear modded by other than the manufacturer is risky, especially for resale value. There are exceptions like Jon Soderberg with Threshold gear.
You might want to consult Great Northern Sound.

http://www.greatnorthernsound.com/repairs.html
I am having my Accuphase P-300's refurbed, they are fantastic even by todays standards and then some.

If your amp is only twenty years old,just use it the way it is,and enjoy...

I once had a very popular amp modded and was VERY unhappy with the outcome.

It's risky,unless you heard one and liked it.

My 2 cents....