BK or Marantz Multi Ch ??

a while ago, i "upgraded" from a b&k avr 202 (rated at 105w/ch) to a pricey, gimmicky denon avr (rated at 140w/ch) and always regretted it--although lacking the (mostly unnecessary) bells and whistles, the b&k was vastly better sounding--a more natural, less "digital" presentation; it also had the best universal remote i've ever used. subjectively, at least, the b&k sounded more powerful--we all know how nebulous/inaccurate the claimed power ratings of avrs can be. now, i don't know what specific marantz model you're considering, but from my experience b&k (or alternatively, arcam) is a considerable step-up from the mass market fare, esp. for music.

I was assuming marantz monoblocks....not sure about any of the other marantz's but the monoblocks are great amps.

I have found B&K Amps to be very solid and strong. I have used a 200w X 5 (7250ii) and a 60W X 5 (I forget the name) and never had a problem watching action packed movies at loud volumes. I also run 3 subs.

I never found the Jap amps to be up to par. Often struggling during high demand times.

System

B&K Ref 50
B&K 7250
Mirage OM 6 with built in subs
Mirage OMR2 rears
Mirage OM3 center
Special made Sub 12 inch long fire cone

I also love that fact the music sounds good to.