2. amps-preamps
  3. 1264130005

Exposure 2010Sv NAD 375BEE Worth comparing??

I ( and others) have been surprised or stunned by the Exposure 2010S as it has been better musicaly in my systenm then anything I have put against includiong integrateds going for 2x its price. I am wondering about the NAD 375BEE as it has a headphone jack . Is this worth comparing?? Does anyone have any experience with these two? Thanks,keith
geph0007
ablang
165 posts
 
NAD amps are good (I've owned a string of them) but not worth buying for the sake of the headphone jack. It's a convenience feature, but it's just not that good on the C372, and I'd imagine the C375 is about the same. I've used it with the AKG K501 (it was OK for these) and the Sennheiser HD600 (pretty poor for these).
geph0007's avatar
geph0007 OP
184 posts
 
Anybody have an experience with the Anthem?? keith
goblue711
30 posts
 
While I have not heard the Exposure, the Anthem 225 is musical and dynamic, with a higher degree of resolution than one would expect in its price range. My brother recently went from an older NAD integrated to Anthem seperates (MCA 20 and TLP 1), and the sonic improvement is stunning. Anthem's products are overachievers.
neilspeed
14 posts
 
I am seriously thinking about purchasing the NAD 375BEE to use with the ATC 11. I was originally interested in purchasing the Exposure 2010S. However; it seems the ATC requires a more powerful amp.
Anyone had experience with paring the NAD or Exposure with the ATC???
Thanks.
geph0007's avatar
geph0007 OP
184 posts
 
I did get a chance to do this and two of us thought the NAD was good but the Exposure was better. More musical and fluid. If you listen to Metalica all day every day ,maybe the NAD but for everything else (even rock ) we thought the Exposure was great. I keep trying to get rid of it but cannot find anything in the range to take it down. keith
More to discover