Jd_df: Thanks for forwarding the email from Steve McCormack.
I'd never really doubted that the McCormack amps would provide a synergy problem. The particular McCormack amps I am using are extremely revealing, so moreover, I've been wondering about the high frequencies in the preamp itself.
A few people have written to me suggesting RCA 12AX7 tubes. In light of all of the tube variations that have been suggested, I guess I'll have to continue to experiment until I find the right combo. The Brimar quad as well as the Mazda quad of tubes I've tried are renowned for being both airy and smooth.
Maybe this preamp is not be my cup of tea, but I am not throwing in the towel as of yet. My overall sense is that this is a fine preamp, so I'll keep working with it a bit longer. It is definitely way different sounding than a older Conrad Johnson PV-12 that I have in another system. I've rolled the tubes in that preamp, and it sounds very sweet, and than again it sounds very "Conrad Johnson."
Thanks to others for their responses.
I'd never really doubted that the McCormack amps would provide a synergy problem. The particular McCormack amps I am using are extremely revealing, so moreover, I've been wondering about the high frequencies in the preamp itself.
A few people have written to me suggesting RCA 12AX7 tubes. In light of all of the tube variations that have been suggested, I guess I'll have to continue to experiment until I find the right combo. The Brimar quad as well as the Mazda quad of tubes I've tried are renowned for being both airy and smooth.
Maybe this preamp is not be my cup of tea, but I am not throwing in the towel as of yet. My overall sense is that this is a fine preamp, so I'll keep working with it a bit longer. It is definitely way different sounding than a older Conrad Johnson PV-12 that I have in another system. I've rolled the tubes in that preamp, and it sounds very sweet, and than again it sounds very "Conrad Johnson."
Thanks to others for their responses.