Amp more important than speakers?


The common wisdom seems to be the opposite (at least from speaker makers), but I have tried the many speakers that have come thru my house on lesser amps or my midfi A/V receiver and something was always very wrong, and things often sounded worse than cheap speakers.
On the other hand, I have tried many humble speakers on my my really good amps (& source) and heard really fine results.

Recently I tried my Harbeth SHL5s (& previously my Aerial 10Ts, Piega P10s, and others) on the receiver or even my Onkyo A9555 (which is nice with my 1985 Ohm Walsh 4s, which I consider mid-fi), and the 3 high end speakers sounded boomy, bland, opaque.

But when I tried even really cheap speakers on my main setup (Edge NL12.1 w/tube preamp) I got very nice results
(old Celestion SL6s, little Jensen midfi speakers).

So I don't think it's a waste of resources to get great amplification and sources even for more humble speakers.
My Harbeth SHL5s *really* benefit from amps & sources that are far more expensive than the Harbeths.

Once I had Aerial 10Ts that sounded like new speakers with vocals to die for when I drove them with a Pass X350 to replace an Aragon 8008.

Oh well, thanks for reading my rambling thoughts here...

So I think I would avoid pairing good speakers with lesser amps,
rgs92
Wow! what a debate. It is great reading this and noticing the opinions of so many knowledgable people. Usually with my friends, they already have an audio system. Typically mid fi equipment and they want better sound quality. Where to begin. With an existing system, to me it totally depends on which component I could tell really is hurting the system most. with most, they don't have a ton of money to buy everything at once. So, one component at a time. They plan on upgrading everything eventually, but they must plan and save. So, sometimes items for sale come up that you really can't pass up. You may walk into a store and the salesperson may have used equipment or new and give you a price you simply can't walk away from for a really nice piece of equipment. Say for example, you have Yamaha or Sony mid fi system. Walk into a store and in the corner is a used Mark Levinson 23 or 23.5 and the owner wants $1000 for it. (I know, this would rarely happen, but...) I would imediately recommend that my friend grab this amp if it works. Or a really decent Audio Research amp or Martin Logan Request speakers. The point is, you never know what will fall into your lap or when. So, keep your eyes open and good friends near and grab what you can when it comes up. If your "buddy" told you to get speakers first and the amps or pre-amp comes up and you pass on it because you believed that you absolutely had to get the speakers first, then you missed a golden opportunity.

Ordinarily, I would tell my friend to get decent speakers first if they already had a mid fi system and then upgrade the electonics accordingly afterwards. One piece at a time. But, as I mentioned previously, sometimes, you can't look a gift horse in the mouth. Grab it if it presents itself to you. But first, establish a sound quality you want and a resulting price point and stay within that price point. There is always something better out there and most Audiogoner's will acknowledge that there is better equipment out there than what they have. There are better cars, houses, audio equipment, etc. You have to know your limits on price and what resulting sound quality you would like.

I ask my friends those three questions. 1) what audio quality do you really want? 2) Do you sit and listen to music or do you use it as background music? and 3) what is your budget? Then, knowing that most of my friends don't have an unlimited budget, I recommend that they upgrade one component at a time. Speakers first, better source component second (cd player or transport and dac), then pre-amp next and amp. Then we play with cables along the way. The next thing I recommend is that they buy very good used equipment instead of new. Because they can purchase very good to outstanding used equipment for the same price as newer but lesser equipment typically.

good discussion and debate.

enjoy
If you fall in love with a speaker, then find an amp to match it.

There are no rules it must be a tube amplifier. Unless you manufacture tube amplifiers.

Speakers first.
There are no rules it must be a tube amplifier.

Audiofeil, I am sure you are aware that there are many people who don't agree with you on this. That is why the tube industry continues to exist 50 years after being declared 'obsolete'. However, we do agree that the amp must match the speaker.
>>07-01-11: Atmasphere
Audiofeil, I am sure you are aware that there are many people who don't agree with you.<<

Agreed and many who do agree with me.

My point is there are no rules that it must be a tube amplifier.

The market clearly supports my point.
I think the room/speaker interaction has to be addressed first and foremost. Some speakers work better in certain types of rooms or some designs are better for small rooms ect..I was always trying to fix my system with new gear. I could take that same stuff and drop it into my bedroom system and it sounded WAY better. I could put cheaper speaker and electonics in the bedroom and it sounded way better than my higher priced stuff in my main system. The room acoustics in my bedroom are just that much better than my main listening room. So there was nothing wrong with my speakers or electronics becuase they worked so well in another room. It just goes to show how important addressing the room. Otherwise you can drop different speakers and electronics in and really not get any closer to goals for the kind of sound you want. Just my 2 cents.