Thanks Jafox,
Yep, that was a typo. Meant to type JL-2.
My understanding is that the original JL-2 began with 6 resistors, then up to 10, and like you say, there is now a newer resistor set which supposedly allow the amps to better handle a catastrophic tube failure.
In order to protect against having to buy a whole new set of tubes if just one blows, I'm thinking about buying a couple extras, and rotating them through as the tube set ages. This would mean that I'd always have a couple around that are similarly aged as the rest, if a replacement is needed.
Are you half kidding about not leaving the room? With the new resistor sets, is it sufficiently safe not to worry about torching?
Yep, that was a typo. Meant to type JL-2.
My understanding is that the original JL-2 began with 6 resistors, then up to 10, and like you say, there is now a newer resistor set which supposedly allow the amps to better handle a catastrophic tube failure.
In order to protect against having to buy a whole new set of tubes if just one blows, I'm thinking about buying a couple extras, and rotating them through as the tube set ages. This would mean that I'd always have a couple around that are similarly aged as the rest, if a replacement is needed.
Are you half kidding about not leaving the room? With the new resistor sets, is it sufficiently safe not to worry about torching?