Pass amps make come in 'watts' but the website lists max output voltage. Simple math will give Caperd the current.....
But, the real issue is the B&W speakers which while rated at a certain sensitivity, certainly are also a bad load. At least the typical B&W speaker has large phase angles coupled with the low impedance dips. This, IMO, is the real issue, to find an amp which will work into large reactive loads at low impedance. Think 'Power Factor'.
The HK, ref'd above and the PASS INT-150 are both rated at 150x2 into 8, both into resistors. The difference will come when you connect to a real world load and find out that while the HK is good, the Pass is really good.
Look at Elvicks numbers. If you are running 16x2 @99db, 109db peaks will be 160x2 peak.....well within the x250s capability. Until you start subtracting power due to power factor considerations and attenuation that comes from listening distance.
But, the real issue is the B&W speakers which while rated at a certain sensitivity, certainly are also a bad load. At least the typical B&W speaker has large phase angles coupled with the low impedance dips. This, IMO, is the real issue, to find an amp which will work into large reactive loads at low impedance. Think 'Power Factor'.
The HK, ref'd above and the PASS INT-150 are both rated at 150x2 into 8, both into resistors. The difference will come when you connect to a real world load and find out that while the HK is good, the Pass is really good.
Look at Elvicks numbers. If you are running 16x2 @99db, 109db peaks will be 160x2 peak.....well within the x250s capability. Until you start subtracting power due to power factor considerations and attenuation that comes from listening distance.