Hi Paul,
I have no particular insight into that. But I note that the MC402 and MC501 are both described as double-balanced, meaning that each channel consists of two fully balanced amplifiers that are bridged together via the autoformer. I'd expect that a key factor in the choice of design approach was that the hardware required to implement a fully balanced amplifier that could provide the current necessary to support those kinds of high power levels into low impedance loads, using conventional approaches that don't use autoformers, would result in a large increase in their already very hefty size and weight, with cost increasing commensurately.
Best regards,
-- Al
I have no particular insight into that. But I note that the MC402 and MC501 are both described as double-balanced, meaning that each channel consists of two fully balanced amplifiers that are bridged together via the autoformer. I'd expect that a key factor in the choice of design approach was that the hardware required to implement a fully balanced amplifier that could provide the current necessary to support those kinds of high power levels into low impedance loads, using conventional approaches that don't use autoformers, would result in a large increase in their already very hefty size and weight, with cost increasing commensurately.
Best regards,
-- Al