2. amps-preamps
  3. 1326944210

Best investment for upgrade a RB-1090 or MC300

I have B&W 802D's and I am trying to decide where to invest the rest of my upgrade budget to get the most bang for the buck. I am currently running them off an RMB-1095 with AQ OAK cables and a Rotel RSX-1056 Receiver. Any advice on whether I should invest the rest of my budget into a single higher quality dual channel amplifier (MC300 or even MC352/402) or stick with a cheaper RMB-1090 and focus on a better pre-amp with balanced outputs, interconnects and transport etc?
redm
bizango1
276 posts
 
I had the RB-1090 and liked it a lot when I had a large room and speakers that benefitted from a ton of power (PSB Stratus Goldi, Revel F30). One thing though, you mention a better preamp with balanced outputs but the RB-1090 is not a balanced amp even though it has XLR connections and claims to be a "balanced design". Same thing goes for the matching RC-1090 preamp. The XLR inputs and outputs are converted to single ended inside. It wasn't important to me and I still thought they were a great combo.
gshepardbuster's avatar
gshepardbuster
620 posts
 
I would try and get everything close to the same level. The 802ds are very revealing speakers and any improvements made will be easily heard. Running with a balanced preamp to amp makes a big difference and might be the cheaper alternative.
xti16
1,525 posts
 
My vote would be for a better amp and forget about a receiver for those speakers. Then again when the upgrade budget is available again go for a source. Last should cables. I say that because when I had a Bryston B100sst and I tried different sources and had to 'squint' a little to hear the difference between sources. I bought a Meridian G08. Then I upgraded the Byrston to an Octave V70SE. I just recently I put back my original Yamaha cdx1030 (which I did have to squint a bit). As good as the Yamaha seemed then I can't listen to it now. That has been my experience and why I recommended that order.
Good Luck
More to discover