VAC Owners:Outboard Phono Stage?

Thanks Al and Bill. Your advice and suggestions are appreciated.

If you're open to more questions (anyone jump in here), here are a few that have bubbled up through my dark grey matter in preparation for my new pre:

1. Now that I'll have both amp and preamp able to support Balanced ICs, is there any advantage to having the connection between pre and amp be balanced while all others are single ended?

2. I need to rearrange my rack. Although the Sig's power supply looks really cool with the lit up logo, shouldn't it be as far from my amp and preamp as possible, as in not in the rack? I see the pre stacked on top of the PS in photos, but I thought that was for advertising convenience...

3. Do any of you fellow nut cases cap your unused RCAs on the back of your preamps? Does it make a difference?

I can't wait to get this thing into my system! Thanks all!

Alón

Props to Albert Porter for turning me on to the KAB device. I knew they existed, but he zero'd in on that one, the company is reliable, and you can get the device quickly.
As to Alonski's questions, I can only offer my own experience:
1. Yes, there are benefits to using the balanced connectors even if everything in the chain is not fully balanced. I also like the firm connection made by XLRs. Whether you can hear a difference, I don't know. I have identical lengths of the same cable terminated both ways, but have not bothered to compare on the stretch between my phono stage and line stage.
2. My assumption on separate power supplies was that they were made separate for a reason. I don't know that you have to go to the length of hiding it, but I think power supplies have the potential to throw off a lot of garbage, and getting them isolated from low level audio signals is beneficial. Having said that, I had the tube power supply to my old line stage separated by one rack shelf and it was fine. The 'stacking' thing you see in photos is likely the same thing as having a blonde as a hood ornament on the car- you wouldn't drive it that way. :)
3. When the designer of the Veloce line stage was at my house, we tried the caps on the RCAs and it didn't make a difference on my set-up. Not that it wouldn't on another...

Alón, re your three questions:

1)As you may realize, regardless of whether other interconnections in the signal path are balanced or unbalanced, and regardless of whether the two components in question are internally balanced or not, having a balanced connection between them will reduce susceptibility to ground loop effects (both low frequency hum and high frequency buzz); will reduce susceptibility to noise pickup in the interconnects; and in some cases will reduce cable effects and cable differences. On the other hand, none of those things may be significant issues in a given setup. And the balanced vs. unbalanced alternatives will call into play different interface circuitry in the two components, and which may be better will depend on the particular designs.

So what I would suggest is asking Kevin for his opinion and/or trying it both ways.

2)Hard to say what minimum amount of separation would be ideal without having intimate knowledge of, and hands-on experience with, the particular design. Sounds like another question for Kevin.

3)I use shorting plugs (not caps) on unused RCA inputs in my system (not on outputs, of course, which should not be shorted). I doubt that they make any difference, but I suppose it is remotely conceivable that they could reduce noise pickup on unused inputs, that might to a small degree couple into the signal path. IMO caps are unlikely to accomplish anything more than keeping out some dust particles. Other opinions may differ, of course.

Best regards,
-- Al

I own the VAC Signature II with phono and have been pleased with the sound of it. I have owned the Audio Research PH-7 and the EAR solid state 324. The ear is more dynamic than the Audio Research and Kevin's but I have grown to love the fluidity and musicality of VAC's phono. Kevin prefers analog to digital for his listening so you must believe he is taking the time to design a more than satisfactory internal phono. I did swap out my 12AX7's for the Psvane version. The Black Treasure from Shuguang and Psvane tube are made in the same factory and are very similar. I found the Psvane to be quieter and smoother than Kevin's stock phono tubes. I also swapped out the input tubes on his Phi 200 with the Black Treasure 6SN7's and prefer that subtle change. Check out the Tube Store for the Black Treasures. I also can confirm Kevin Haye's support; always generous with his time, input, advice and always honest as the day is long!
I was pulled into the Zesto room last January at T.H.E. Las Vegas by the designer George and his wife Carolyn and truly enjoyed their phono. If you are looking for a very smooth, musical phono this one is incredible for the money. I remembered leaving thinking this unit was far more musical than my ARC PH-7 and anyone who purchased it would not be wanting for anything else; it draws you into the music. I have heard it now on three other occasions and haven't changed my opinion. Great value for the money.

Bill and Al, Thanks once again for sharing your experience and weighing in on my never-ending questions.

HifiManiac, Thanks for advice on tube-rolling the Sig2a... I'll let everything break in fully with the stock tubes first before starting to play around with NOS gems.

I also loved the sound of George's Zesto Phono Stage (I spent more time with him than any other room at both shows I attended this year). They have the sound really dialed in.

What I have not heard yet is a comparison of Zesto's phono with the lush and beautifully detail-rich sound of the Sig2a's MC Phono stage. But I'm in no hurry, once I get my new preamp I think I'll do something radical like listen to music for a few weeks while my system settles in around the new VAC preamp.