Audible Illusions vs CJ preamps: sonic difference?

CJ tube preamps are known for their warmth, forgiving nature and musicality. I don't have any insight about the AI.

Audible Illusions M3A is an extremely musical preamp. Bass, mids and highs are all excellent as well as excellent soundstage. The AI M3B is even better, more resolving and quieter. I have both. The M3A has been in my system since 1996 and I just got the M3B a couple of months ago. The build quality on an AI pre is second to none as well. Both have an excellent phono stage and both have 5 high level inputs, a tape loop and a phono input with very high quality jacks. There are also 2 sets of preamp outputs. The power supply is in a separate cabinet and very beefy.

I prefer the AI sound to the Conrad Johnson.

Bob

I just got my Modulus 3B. While I waited for it much longer than expected, I can only praise its pure presentation. Extended frequency range from low to high. Wide, deep soundstage. Quiet. Awesome MM phono stage. My record collection is transformed.

It blows my former 3A away (but that was an older unit; I cannot comment on current 3A's). The most common knock on CJ gear is that it sounds "dark." Dark is not a word you would ever use in conjunction with the 3B or 3A.

Is the 3A a current production model? Since the 3 has been from A to E, I'd be surprised...?
Jim