OUTLAW RR2150 vs NAD C 326BEE sonic differences?


I own an NAD C 326BEE with a pair of Sound Dynamic 300ti speakers which sounds pretty darn good but the NAD has no phono. I wonder if the OUTLAW RR2150 would be a step up in sound quality. I do not want to spend the money just for the phono option and take a sideways step in sound.

Has anyone compared these two amps? Even a comparison with a NAD 320 or 325 would be helpful.

If anything I would be looking for more high end 'open' quality and/or inner detail.

thanks for any info / tips

Phil
128x128philjolet
Many phono preamps at low prices that are as good as the Outlaw's built in one. Very happy with my Parasound phono pre. Agree that as integrateds the NAD and Outlaw are similar. I have had numerous quality problems with NAD.
Get a NAD pp2. Easy recommendation. It will match your current NAD amp and its only 3" x 5" so its easy to place.
Muzikat, I have kicked around the idea of buying a 375BEE I have presumed it would be better than the Outlaw hands down (maybe I have read too much into the reviews). Also interesting that the Outlaw has a touchy volume control, because I do not like the NAD control - too jumpy.

"Sound wise you would not gain, IMO" thanks for your input.

thanks JI35

Tbromgard good call, a small box may do.
The volume control can be fixed with a Harmony 880 remote. Tech support can change the transmit repeat on volume up and down from X3 to 0. This has been a most welcome change. The phono stage is quite good, but I am running a Bottlehead Seduction phono stage through the tape input, in my RR2150