2. amps-preamps
  3. 1373695261

Cambridge Topaz AM10 vs Yamaha AS300 vs Onkyo

Cambridge Audio TopazAM10 vs Yamaha AS300 vs Onkyo A9050?

Setup: Denon turntable, Denon MC (but high output) cartridge, Wharfedale speakers

This is as far as my budget will stretch, and I'm planning on buying new from Crutchfield. I don't have a separate phono preamp, but all of these have a built in one. They're all around the same price as well, although the Onkyo is 50$ more ($350). Which one would be the best option?

I listen to punk, indie, lo-fi, some folk, and ska. All from past 20 years or so.

Thank you.
toxicwaterfront
tonyangel
309 posts
 
In my experience, NAD equipment is typically under rated and perform beyond their rating. NAD phono sections are usually pretty good, for built in (from what I understand).

Have you given any thought to just having the power cord replaced?

I think that any of the ones that you mentioned would be a step backwards in sound quality. If you just have the urge to spend money, I'd suggest checking out the classifieds and getting into a used NAD. Lots of bang for the buck there.
zd542
5,339 posts
 
"07-15-13: Toxicwaterfront
My current amp is a NADC315BEE, but unfortunately the (non-detachable) power cord doesn't work anymore!"

You can probably fix that yourself. Open it up and have a look.
schubert
7,386 posts
 
Old thread but CA amps have lots of problems, Yamaha seldom any.
mesch
3,479 posts
 
I agree with Tonyangel and Zd542. Fix the NAD. Then consider an outboard phono stage. One worth considering is the Lounge LCR, 40 dB gain, 100pF capacitance. I am using one with a Bluepoint No. 2.
zd542
5,339 posts
 
I have a question for Schubert and any other Yamaha people. Yamaha prints "Natural Sound" on pretty much everything they make. Is it true?
More to discover