In 2008, Robert Harley claimed could not understand how Cambridge could build such a great CD player like the Cambridge 840C. He shook his head in disbelief at its price to performance ratio Now he claims that the new Cambridge 851C exceeds the previous 840C in several areas.
Fortunately, I have found a VGC 840C at auction on Audiogon well under $1000. The tariff for the new improved Cambridge 851C is $1899, possibly $1450 "used". Reviewers can be a pain in the ass sometimes in how quickly they can pivot off of one product( in this case the 840C) made by a manufacturer, and jump on the band wagon for the much improved version.
I just am trying to upgrade off of my current player, the Rega Apollo. In a "one on one shootout" with the Cambridge 840C it would probably lose, if not get badly beaten. The technology of the 840C provides several innovative upgrades to the performance of a CD player BUT, By now claiming the sound OF the Cambridge 851C is not only improved over the 840C but better, basically make me feel I am back to square one. WHY??? Because the performance of the 840C has been denigrated, and therefore brings into serious question whether if is better almost across the board than the Rega Apollo
Maybe this point just introduces into the context of the original thread an issue which is debatable or even irrelevant. Sorry, but I needed to raise this point, and blow off some steam.
I think most of us believe, we don't want to pay retail for a premier product to acquire a replacement for a currently owned product; and in the consideration and decision ritual, eventually that premier product may becomes dated and replaced by a new considerably improved one. However, the new and improved version can only be acquired at near retail pricing. Therefore, the freakin cycle begins again, until some reviewer debunks the sound that he lauded before to now praise the performance of another upgraded model.
VERY FRUSTRATING!!!