Walker Audio Silver jumper vs Nordost Norse jumper


Hello everyone,
My first post here. Did anyone compare these two jumpers?
Just recently I went from Nordost Flatline Gold MK III to Reference 3A speaker cable, completing the task of making all of my cables Reference 3A.
Reference 3A sounds more extended (better lows, more noticeable in highs) and it did firm up the sound across the spectrum. Better definition can be due to higher speed but also the synergy with the rest of the cables, especially with my speakers - Reference 3A Veena.
Your insight is much appreciated!
128x128bato65
Mountainsong

Let me know if you'd like to sell your Jena Labs jumpers. They would be synergistic with my Jena Labs speaker cables.

Thanks,
Bato65, when you get interested in exploring the Walker Audio Silver Jumper cables, keep in mind that, if you purchase directly from Walker Audio, Lloyd offers a full refund within 30-days if they don't make an improvement you find worthwhile. This has always been his policy on direct sales.

https://walkeraudio.com/shop/walker-silver-jumpers-for-bi-wired-speakers/

From my experience with Lloyd's products, you will hear an improvement that you'll not want to part from.
.
The reason is very simple.
Silver can carry 6% more information than any other material (AES-Standard), followed from Cu. With gold you will loose 16% from the possible signal transfer. Ever checked your binding posts? :-)