worse entertainer or performer of all time??

Will someone, anyone, please educate me to the value of this topic? It seems to me to be a free forum for anyone to display their bias towards others. What good does it do? Remember, Paul SImon said it best, one man's ceiling is another man's floor. Human behavior is ugly at time. This is one of those times.

Rpeluso,

Will someone, anyone, please educate me to the value of this topic? It seems to me to be a free forum for anyone to display their bias towards others. .......Human behavior is ugly at time. This is one of those times.

Three is no value in the topic. It's just personal taste. There are other threads like this for wrist watches, Scotch whisky, automobiles, motorcycles and likely a dozen more.

It's just a way to share opinions with people we know and like here at Audiogon. Some of the posts here about music and artists made me laugh out loud although I admit mine was not the least bit funny.

I dislike TV ads too, I could fill pages about how bad some most of them are.

This is the first time, after all these years on the 'goN, that I disagree with something that Albert has written. I think that there is value in a thread like this. I think that the expressed opinions say almost as much about the musical tastes and acumen of the writers, as do expressions of likes. Additionally, it can motivate some to reconsider some of their opinions about certain artists.

Sure there is "bias" in how we each process what any given performer brings to the table, but I think it's also important to be able to discern wether our reaction is due to liking or not liking the performer's style, and when the performer just plain sucks; they are two very different things. I would turn the question around and ask what value it serves to be stuck in
a kind of artistic relativism where everything "must" have some value. Not!

I must say I am surprised by some of the nominees, and it proves my previous point. Take Kenny G. We love to knock Kenny G. I think we can all agree that he is not the most inspired improviser of all time; and the tone he produces (on soprano, not on tenor) is hard to take. No, he is not one of "the greats". But, to overlook (or not understand) the fact that the guy has a significant amount of proficiency on the instrument, can phrase, and has reasonably good time is just silly. And to nominate him for "worst ever" just shows a lack of understanding of just how bad other performers are (Britney Spears) who are simply the "product" of producers, and have very little ability.

David Hasselhoff has to be the worse. And he looks like Bruce Kardashian.

TAYLOR HICKS....FORMER American IDOL winner. Hopefully, he has returned to selling shoes at Sears.