Why can't all/most recordings be this good?


Changing components this weekend (swapping out my MF Trivista 300 for a Hovland hp 100/Bel 1001 Mk V fronting Meadowlark Blue Heron II’s), I picked some of my cd’s that had, what I consider, exemplary sound. I listened through the day & evening, marveling at the crisp, delineated, but musical sound but also began to question: Why aren’t all/most recordings done in this manner?
I am not a sound engineer nor musician. I have no knowledge of mixing, microphone placement, layering, etc. But some recordings are so outstanding in their clarity, instrumentation, and pure enjoyment that many others pale in comparison. Granted, I am dealing in only one aspect (redbook cd) of media, and only with a single genre of music. And I certainly didn’t compile an exhaustive list of recordings; just ones I listened to of late. I would certainly like to add to the list and hear other’s opinion.

Lenard Cohen Live in London, 10 More Songs
Rickie Lee Jones Rickie Lee Jones
Aaron Neville Warm Your Heart
Chris Izak Baja Sessions
Allison Krause and Union Station Live
Govi No Strings Attached
farmdoc
I WAS TOLD BUT I CAN'T SAY FOR SURE BUT IF YOU GET A BIG NAME BAND OR ARTIST THEY DON'T SELL THE BEST RECORDINGS BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT PEOPLE TO SELL REMASTERED UNAUTHORIZED COPIES. THE ARISTS YOU LISTED ARE NOT BIG NAMES
I HAVE Govi No Strings Attached AND Chris Izak Baja Sessions
It is sad but true that there seems to be no correlation between sound quality and record sales, therefore there is no economic incentive to do records better. I have heard of several instances in which record companies declined to use better manufacturing techniques even though the cost increases would be nominal. Some artists have both the power and inclination to demand good sound quality, most lack one or the other.
not everyone's cup of tea (it's 'artsy'), but Laurie Anderson's 'Life on a String' (nonesuch) is one of my favorite 'demo' CDs - astonishing sound for 'redbook'.