Fafafion
Huh?
Try rereading my last paragraph.
if your RB source is top notch and your SACD player only converts DSD to PCM output, it's entirely possible the RB could sound better than the SACD.. as the SACD aspect is not the optimum DSD throughput. BTW not all SACD are purely DSD masters front to back, as I understand it and so some of my own SACDs indicate.
I also have some SACD discs which simply do not sound any better than the orig RB CD to me
. Just as some CDs dont sound very good either. Hence my mention of the process being as important as are those higher res numbers to achieve HIGH FIDELITY in the recording, and the note on the systems needs to fully realize the benefit of such software!
An extreme ex would be playing back an HD, or SACD disc via a boom box vs a home audio system, given both can play those formats.
BTW
regardless the range of the speakers, be they full or limited, the advantages of more resolute discs will reveal themselves within that band width the loud speakers can reproduce. So a full range speaker isnt a necessity to see the benefits of a well recorded high res disc
its merely more advantageous to have such reproducers on hand.
Kijanki
My bad... the article I read was a while back. I must have confused the statements. Could have sworn it was 20 though. Must be more as you say here though as I cant find any note of the word or sampling rate changes with HD CD, only an encoding decoding process that is added to the hardware/software for enhancement of that format over standard RB Cds.
I did see where several chip makers have added the decoding in some of their chips, eg., Burr Brown 1732. MS Media Player from version 9 up also have this tech included into them for HD CD playback. One note said MP would at times show the HD logo when playing a HD CD.
The term High Definition gets thrown about a lot too and doesnt always hold purely to the technology PMI developed originally.