Pink Floyd

Listen to any Floyd prior to DSOTM and tell me they weren't stoners in the studio.

Hum, after my comment I see a few holes in my library. :-)

My wife always tells me I'll never grow up and I guess she's right. I'm 54 and still dig PF. I've been wanting a SACD copy of WYWH, Meddle and the Wall for a long time.

Yeah, I've mellowed with age and am actually listening to Tony Bennett duets as I write, but the old rockers can still get me going. Just not as often as they used to. :0)

Someone mentioned the Delicate Sound of Thunder concert and I would forgo all SACD's for a remastered copy of that concert on Blue Ray. Best concert ever IMO.

You're not alone, Jack. I'm 55 and listen to just about every genre there is. I can easily go from PF to country swing to chick with guitar to opera and back all in one session. ;-) I like what I like and make no apologies for it.

Who gives a shit if they were "stoners in the studio"? So were the Beatles. And both bands were divine.
You think Cream would've been half as good without chemical additives? I doubt it.
Dan_ed, are you trying to say you wouldn't listen to a band or don't like a band merely because they used LSD or pot or who-knows-what? Or that the music must not be good because it was drug-influenced? I don't get your point.