The earth shall not be considered as an effective ground-fault current path.
From 2005 NEC 250.4 (A) 5
True, but the presence of such a path will do no harm as long as the proper path is also present, at the service entrance (that proper path presenting a much lower impedance to fault current than the extraneous path, as diagrammed in Whitlock's paper).
The earth does not have some magical mystical power that sucks AC noise from our audio systems.
Agreed. As I admitted, you are likely correct that a ground rod near the system would accomplish nothing.
More and more audio equipment manufacturers are building their equipment with double insulated AC power wiring thus eliminating the need for an equipment ground. They are finding the use of an equipment ground causes more problems than the added cost of the double insulated power wiring.
That's interesting; maybe one of the problems they are finding is exactly what I was describing -- voltage offsets in safety grounds causing noise currents to flow through signal return paths, a problem which would be eliminated if signal ground and ac safety ground were not both tied to chassis.
Stray voltage
Interesting paper, but it doesn't seem to be particularly relevant, and I don't think it makes its case completely. His theme seems to be that cost reduction measures taken by utility companies cause ac return paths to power company equipment to be partially through the earth, instead of entirely through their wires, and that that is somehow harmful to people and animals. But I didn't see any explanation of how that current flow might result in significant voltage difference across any individual animal or person, other than brief mention of in-ground swimming pools (and I'd want to see more evidence or quantitative explanation before concluding that he is right in that case).
In any event, I don't think his paper has relevance to connecting an audio system ac safety ground to earth, when a very nearby connection to earth of that same ac ground would exist at the service panel.
Thanks for the interesting read, though!
Best for the holidays and new year,
-- Al