Which is more accurate: digital or vinyl?


More accurate, mind you, not better sounding. We've all agreed on that one already, right?

How about more precise?

Any metrics or quantitative facts to support your case is appreciated.
128x128mapman
A bit off topic here, but it seems to me that a lot of classical musicians spend a heck of a lot of time working on their "tone".
What are some examples of music that does not sound like music? Isn't that a paradox?

Live, vinyl, 78 rpm, CD, mp3..... it all sounds like music to me. The thing is even all live music sounds different based on many factors that come into play in any particular case. Same true with recordings. One must be careful about making generalized statements like all ______ sound like this or have a problem with ______. Its all good in the end if used effectively. 78s (gen 1 technology) does have the most obvious limits, but I have a good feel even for what 78s should sound like so I expect nothing more which enables me to appreciate some of teh good things that even such a technically flawed format like that has to offer.
A bit off topic here, but it seems to me that a lot of classical musicians spend a heck of a lot of time working on their "tone".

Electric guitarists do too! Like crazy- very picky as well.
++++ A bit off topic here, but it seems to me that a lot of classical musicians spend a heck of a lot of time working on their "tone".+++++

True, but I assure you that even more energy is spent on good rhythm. But interestingly (and this points to some of audio-related issues being discussed here) while rhythm is something that can certainly be "worked on" or practiced by a musician, the kind of rhythmic flexibility and control that defines an artist as opposed to, simply, a good musician is something that is difficult to learn. Many times (not always) it is something that is innate. Tone can be worked on and developed more easily. The control and flexibility that define an artist, and which allow him/her to be expressive in a way that really touches the listener is what gets distorted very easily by recordings.
People make the rhythm, not the recordings, right?

I'm not sure how one format or another gets an advantage regarding rhythm.

Surely imperfections in record manufacturing including warping can have an effect on things. Not sure I understand how digital would normally have any rhythm issues. Resolution, maybe, but resolution and effects of that is different from rhythm at least with how I understand these things.