Listener fatigue: what does it really mean?


Okay, so I used to think that listener fatigue meant that your ears just kind of got tired from listening to speakers that were overly bright. I don't have a good understanding of the make up of an ear, but I believe there are muscles in an ear that, I guess, expand and contract while we listen to music and I figured that's what it meant to have listener fatigue. Now, I'm thinking that listener fatigue is maybe more than your ears just getting tired but actually, your whole body getting tired and feeling drained. I experienced this time and time again listening to my paradigm studio's. They are somewhat bright and provide quite a bit of detail in my oppinion, so I'm wondering if, since there was such a great amount of detail coming through, that it was physically draining because I'm sitting there analyzing everything that's coming through the speakers. I would wake up and first thing in the morning, grab a cup of coffee and start listening to music (my daily routine) and 20-30 minutes later start nodding off and I couldn't figure out what was going on. I've been sitting here this morning listening to my new vandersteen's for two hours and can't get enough. I feel like I could listen all day and that I'm almost energized from listening vs. drained.

Soooo, what are your oppinions about what listener fatigue is and why it's caused?
b_limo
Csontos, you are spot on.

The specs an amplifier has on paper don't reflect the whole story though. An amplifier with very low distortion with steady state signals (sine waves, used to test for distortion) can act quite differently when asked to reproduce a waveform that is constantly changing.

The feedback used in the amplifier can have a huge bearing on this phenomena. So it does not follow that the lowest distortion on paper will also be the least fatiguing.

Generally speaking, the use of feedback in an audio circuit will reduce most forms of distortion but will leave audible amounts of odd ordered harmonic distortion caused by the ringing of the signal in the circuit due to propagation delays in that circuit. In a nutshell, the feedback always arrives back at the input of the circuit slightly too late to do its job right.

The higher the frequency, the more pronounced this problem becomes. Since our ears use the odd orders to sort out how loud a sound is, essentially the use of negative feedback in an audio circuit violates one of the most fundamental rules of human hearing. To avoid this you have to avoid the use a negative feedback.

Such amps and preamps that do so will seem to have higher distortion on paper, but quite often will have less listener fatigue on this account.

"Mapman, my gut is you would probably like Boones Farm."

Probably not. I like wine but am not crazy about most wines out of the bottle. I prefer to add my own "tweaks" as needed in most cases.
Ralph, I gotta hear you tell me it's possible that odd ordered harmonic distortion in an ss amp can be low enough to render it inaudible with or without NFB. Please tell me it's so. I don't wanna buy a tube amp:)
"I don't wanna buy a tube amp:)"

I like to look at and listen to other peoples tube amps and have always thought tubes are the coolest thing since sliced bread... but neither do I.

After all if a SS amp starts to glow all pretty, you probably have a problem. :^)
Csontos, you put your finger on the leading edge of what is possible with transistors.

Here is one of the difficulties you are dealing with. Transistors have a non-linear capacitive aspect inherent in the junctions of the devices. In fact some semiconductors take advantage of this capacitance, as in the example of varactor diodes that are used in the tuning of modern FM radios.

This non-linear capacitance is magnified by the amount of current through the junction. It results in non-linearities in the amplifier that employs such devices. Now if you were reading between the lines, one way to reduce this problem is have the amp drive a higher load impedance. This will reduce the current in the driver transistors and output devices.

There are other advantages to a higher load impedance besides this one, but that is one effective means of reducing harshness in transistor amps. Of course you will get less power, but in high end audio usually we are more concerned about sound quality rather than raw sound pressure.

Now in tubes there is also an inter-element capacitance; the difference is that it is constant and unchanging regardless of signal level rather than non-linear and changing. This makes it a lot easier to build a circuit that is low in odd ordered harmonics.

This seems to me to be one of the things that has to be dealt with in a transistor design before overcoming the apparent advantages of tubes insofar as listener fatigue is concerned. One patented method to get around this problems involves heating the power transistors to a high (+100c) temperature- I have heard one of those amps and its quite impressive- but also very expensive- over $100,000 for a 100-watt/channel amplifier. Plus it made all the heat of a class A tube amp of the same power.

So it seems to me that in more practical terms tubes do have the upper hand in this regard, as its fairly easy to build a zero-feedback tube amplifier. That is hard to do with transistors; but Ayre and the Pass First Watt amps are examples, and IMO these are some of the best transistor amps made today.