Hard drive storage still need good cd player?

Samuellaudio - please dont lump my converters with the likes of Sonos and "similar" boxes. There are no similar boxes IMO. If you look at what it costs to mod a transport, buy a good digital cable and the time and money it takes to re-write all of your CD's, the computer audio converter is cheaper, even if you factor-in the cost of a laptop at $1K. Besides, the computer converter will outperform even the modded transport with expensive digital cable plus rewritten CD's. I demo this exact thing at CES each year, and each and every listener prefers the audio quality of the computer audio converter over the Transport.

Steve N.
Empirical Audio
Manufacturer

So begs the other question. How can you get the best possible copy from CD to HD. For sake of lazyness I used the built in cd tray, all the while knowing already that it sounded worst than my transport, but wasent' thinking about real good sound quality when I started, now I see that I can get pretty good...better than I originally thought.

Michel

Apparently, when you use Exact Audio Copy (EAC) or JRiver (with error checking enabled), no bits are lost during a CD rip--hard drive copy is exactly the same as the original CD. So, is there any benefit to using CD treatments or antistatic spray prior to rip?

Million dollar question there Bigamp LOL

When I started I was a fanatic about doing a "full treatment" prior to ripping. After scribbling green ink over too many CDs, and trying literally every paste, powder and spray I could find, I settled in on a routine of Mapleshade's Optrix spray wiped off with Kimwipes (lab grade tissues for optics) and then a shot from their anti static zapper prior to ripping. (If nothing else this improved playback when I took a disc to play in the car)

When I broke down my system for some remodeling I put all my secret sauce stuff away and digitized new CDs right out of the jewel case. At a certain point you have to say that bitz is bitz and move on. I can't say that I have noticed a difference though I still feel a twinge of audio nervosa every time...

The distinction here is not subtle, we are not trying to keep a laser reading in real time happy; we are just trying to suck the data off the disk which is pretty standard stuff for a computer. So in my mind, laser read errors, and all the nightmare of electro-optical-mechanical playback devices is eliminated - thus the instant improvement most everyone notices.

However I am glad to have tried all the stuff. Some of the used CDs I buy have what I like to think of as peanut butter on them - then its soap and water followed by Optrix. They rip faster and with fewer or no errors.

I just made the following relevant post on the Computer Audio Asylum:

http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/pcaudio/messages/16783.html