Zanden transport and DAC or PC audio system

Not to go into fashionable digi-bashing, but I couldn't agree more

start with digital and end up with vinyl, never the other way around

A very simple procedure and one that gives a lot of pleasure, rather than get irritated and complain about digital, cd's, etc.
For those who have both sources: ALWAYS start music sessions with cd. After the daily cacophony any cd will offer great pleasure and musical serenity. Then, if necessary, switch to vinyl and you will get a new dose of pleasure and serenity.

Alternatively, you can spend a whole session listening to digital as long as you don't switch to analogue. If you do switch to analogue, switching back to digital is irksome and best avoided. This robs you of one of your sources!

Detlof, your comments regarding the Spoiler vs the Zanden front end are fascinating. I wonder if you can clarify if this is an older Zanden front end or the latest Zanden Model 2000 transport mated with a Zanden Model 5000 Signature DAC? If the latter, a very intriguing proposition seems to be be whether Steve's Pacecar (which is something I am looking to add soon) could be mated with the Zanden DAC via I2S (the Zanden Signature being one of the few DACs with an I2S input)? After all, one of the claimed selling points of the Signature DAC is the I2S input.

I suppose my question is whether you have any thoughts as to what the weak link in the Zanden combo is? Is it the Transport (vs the Pacecar) or the DAC (Spoiler vs Zanden)? Reading through Zanden's website, they claim that their I2S interconnect is proprietary but I wonder if that means that other transports (such as Steve's Pacecar) cannot be connected to the DAC via I2S?

KLFK,
Yes it was the latest Zanden combo. As to what the weak spot here might be, I really don't have the expertise to answer. But I can tell you this: I've tried the modest TRENDS USB converter with the Model 5000 Signature DAC and it sounded excellent, with very good resolution, timbre and pitch. The Spoiler sounded "richer" in comparison, voices , strings, were more natural and had more presence and body. Playing the same music from the transport directly was a tad more resolving with slightly better dynamic swings, but not very much. From that experience one could infer that the Model 2000 is the culprit but I would never dare to cast that in stone and I have not followed up that experiment in depth.
About the Pacecar Model 5000 combination have you already discussed that with Steve? I am afraid I cannot help you on this one either. But if you want to get one anyway, I suppose you could experiment and see or rather hear.....
Best saisonal greetings and happy listening,
Detlof

Hi Detlof,

Seasons greetings to you too.

I will definitely get the Pacecar but am curious at to what DAC to get. I will not get a DAC immediately but intend to slowly acquire my stereo system. For the near future, I intend to hook it up to my HT processor, which is of course not ideal, but the other pieces to the puzzle will be acquired over time. After the Pacecar, a DAC and then a stereo preamp with HT bypass.

Out of curiosity, did you try the Model 2000 transport with the Spoiler DAC? If so, what were your findings?

Cheers,

KLFK

HI KLFK,
No I didn't I'm afraid. Should have though, but I didn't feel like experimenting: Too lazy and happy with my rig, preferred to listen to music. (: