firewire or USB for external music storage drive?

Thanks all

I an currently using the USB 2.0 cable to the hard drive. The only change I made to the standard setup of JRiver was to increase the buffering of the Asio driver by about 20%. It correlated with removing the occasional dropout.

So it looks like my old laptop is fast enough as a stand alone music player for red book flac 'd content.

I was also curious about the newer high resolution formats. So based on this conversation the Hard drive to PC through USB 2.0 won't be a problem since the file size will just be larger and a high resolution DAC will take care of the rest.

Thanks

About the usb dac thing, and I know that isn't what the original poster was asking - while Firewire Dacs are few, firewire to spdif converters aren't, and they are relatively inexpensive ($200), so you wouldn't be limited to a USB dac - you can get any dac you wish.

About the usb dac thing, and I know that isn't what the original poster was asking - while Firewire Dacs are few, firewire to spdif converters aren't, and they are relatively inexpensive ($200), so you wouldn't be limited to a USB dac - you can get any dac you wish.

I suggest you read the set of ten interviews on Positive Feedback that I linked to in my original post. Pay particular attention to the interface most of the designer / manufacturer / engineers are using and why they prefer it. I believe it is the first question each of them ask. It's interesting reading. Most, but not all, choose USB for very similar reasons.

In practice I would completely agree with you regarding USB not actually running up against any walls when streaming audio. I was not, however, talking about robbing the processor of any speed or capacity, it is robbing the USB bus of throughput/device. A USB 1.1 bus has a maximum speed of 12mbps and USB 2.0 480mbps. The more devices that are using the same USB bus, the more limited the actual transfer rate of each device becomes. As I said, I've never run up against the wall except when using the computer to do other memory intensive processing at the same time and I don't think that had to do with the bus being taxed in those cases. My point was, if given a choice, why tax the transfer rate of the interface you are using to deliver the music to the DAC (assuming you are using USB which is very likely). If you use a firewire drive you will not tax the USB bus.

Hi everybody.

I have a USB cable running out of the rear of My PC to my USB DAC. I also have a USB cable running out of the PC's front to my printer. I have no idea if the 2 cables are riding on the same bus.

Assuming that they are on the same bus, does the printer USB "tax" the DAC USB only when I use the printer or is it a conitnuous thing?

Assuming that they are on the same bus, does the printer USB "tax" the DAC USB only when I use the printer or is it a conitnuous thing?

The printer will "tax" the USB bus only when it is active. I doubt very much whether the throughput would interfere with the flow of music though. You can test it out yourself.