Should a good system sound bad with bad recording?


A friend of mine came home with a few CDs burnt out of "official" bootleg recordings of Pearl Jam NorAm tour...the sound was so crappy that he looked at me a bit embarrassed, thinking "very loud" that my system was really not great despite the money I spent. I checked the site he downloaded from...full concerts are about 200 MB on average. I guess I am dealing with a case of ultra-compressed files. Should I be proud that the sound was really crappy on my set up?!!!!
beheme
i value my ears too much to listen beyond 85 db.

... what i am trying to say is it depends upon preference and your choice of music.

Good point.

My point was that most real world instruments/orchestra/band go significantly louder than 85 db and a good sytem should replicate this stuff too (not just the soft music)
nobody has defined what a good system is.

if one assumes it means as accurate as one can afford, then such a system is at the mercy of the recording.

a bad recording can sound brutal and a great recording can be sublime. thus, one may suffer the extremes of bliss and misery.

for me, i don't want to suffer when listening to bad recordings. i believe in the law of the golden mean.

life is too short to have unpleasant experiences. if it is not hifi then so be it.
nobody has defined what a good system is.

A good system does what the audiophile wants it to do given a particular price point.

Of course, most audiophiles have no system goals and end up in a perpetual equipment swap, not unlike a dog chasing its own tail.

Am I good or what?

With psychic power and primal intensity,
Psychic: :)
Not far from the truth (if at all far...)!!

if one assumes it ("good system") means as accurate as one can afford, then such a system is at the mercy of the recording

I would qualify this to "accurate to the point source".

I like such a system. And bad recordings sound worse -- but one can still enjoy the music; I don't suffer.