Check out the boogie babys, they can get down;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgXPl3XM_NA
Enjoy the music.
Jazz for aficionados
Check out the boogie babys, they can get down; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgXPl3XM_NA Enjoy the music. |
Frogman, even when you say "objective reality", whose objective reality are we referring to, and who is to be the final judge in regard to this reality. It's only in mathematics can we have one objective reality. There is no stranger reality than the one in which we live every day. I prefer the total unreality of the 60's when we didn't have to face reality. Unfortunately time is a reality that's totally inescapable, and it's finally caught up to many people including yours truly; but I'll still savor these final moments by enjoying good music, speaking of which, I think it's time to go into the 80's. Enjoy the music. |
I think fusion is where jazz lost it's definition. Before the 70's, when someone said "jazz", you knew what they were talking about, but after then, it could mean almost anything. Presently, the music that fits the jazz definition sounds like an imitation of the jazz of the 50's and 60's; something I'm not especially turned on by. Pat Metheney caught my ear after the 70's; his music was new, fresh, and kind of abstract, I liked it. Whether or not it was jazz, I couldn't care less; others can argue that point. "As Falls Wichita, So Falls Wichita Falls" was probably the first album I bought, this is quite abstract; in spots it's flat and dull, like the Missouri plains but for the most part it's interesting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwfVarzG1js "Offramp" was another album that caught my attention. "Are You Going With Me" and "Au lait" were two of my favorite cuts on this album. I don't know what you would call the dreamy and abstract "Au Lait", but I like it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uh8bpl5KCPg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5b0CHysDsjw Enjoy the music. |
O-10, it's really much simpler than that and it doesn't have to be personalized at all. It's not about WHO'S reality wins; it's not a contest. There may be some disagreement in some quarters, but when the vast majority of astute (or, at least, experienced) listeners agree on something, then I would say that constitues a "reality". At that point, the dissenting voice has two choices: 1. Disregard the consensus, or 2. Consider the possibility that there might be something to learn; that one is not seeing (hearing) all that there is to see. Personally, I think that 2. is an infinitely better option. Anyway, we will simply have to agree to disagree on this. Great clips. I have always liked Metheny's music. He is a wonderful musician. |
1980: (if this doesn't "fit the definition", then I don't know what does) https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CGRQ6LtbBZk 1983: (why "fusion" doesn't have to be a dirty word) https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PN8SAAMG8_o |