2. music
  3. 1361722327

Jazz for aficionados

Jazz for aficionados

I'm going to review records in my collection, and you'll be able to decide if they're worthy of your collection. These records are what I consider "must haves" for any jazz aficionado, and would be found in their collections. I wont review any record that's not on CD, nor will I review any record if the CD is markedly inferior. Fortunately, I only found 1 case where the CD was markedly inferior to the record.

Our first album is "Moanin" by Art Blakey and The Jazz Messengers. We have Lee Morgan , trumpet; Benney Golson, tenor sax; Bobby Timmons, piano; Jymie merrit, bass; Art Blakey, drums.

The title tune "Moanin" is by Bobby Timmons, it conveys the emotion of the title like no other tune I've ever heard, even better than any words could ever convey. This music pictures a person whose down to his last nickel, and all he can do is "moan".

"Along Came Betty" is a tune by Benny Golson, it reminds me of a Betty I once knew. She was gorgeous with a jazzy personality, and she moved smooth and easy, just like this tune. Somebody find me a time machine! Maybe you knew a Betty.

While the rest of the music is just fine, those are my favorite tunes. Why don't you share your, "must have" jazz albums with us.

Enjoy the music.
orpheus10
frogman
7,478 posts
 
O-10, it's really much simpler than that and it doesn't have to be personalized at all. It's not about WHO'S reality wins; it's not a contest. There may be some disagreement in some quarters, but when the vast majority of astute (or, at least, experienced) listeners agree on something, then I would say that constitues a "reality". At that point, the dissenting voice has two choices: 1. Disregard the consensus, or 2. Consider the possibility that there might be something to learn; that one is not seeing (hearing) all that there is to see. Personally, I think that 2. is an infinitely better option. Anyway, we will simply have to agree to disagree on this.

Great clips. I have always liked Metheny's music. He is a wonderful musician.
frogman
7,478 posts
 
1980:
(if this doesn't "fit the definition", then I don't know what does)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CGRQ6LtbBZk

1983:
(why "fusion" doesn't have to be a dirty word)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PN8SAAMG8_o
orpheus10 OP
8,668 posts
 

Frogman, While your first post fits the definition of jazz, Michael Brecker does not fit the definition of fusion, even by your own definition which was rock and jazz.

Enjoy the music.
orpheus10 OP
8,668 posts
 

What's the matter Rok, the cat's got your tongue? Don't come back until you can explain that expression, I never understood it.

Enjoy the music.
frogman
7,478 posts
 
Huh? Why not? Please explain. My post was meant to highlight the band not just Brecker, and Steps Ahead was most certainly a fusion band. While I don't consider Wiki to be be definitive, look at their description of the band. More importantly, their music most definitely has strong rock, as well as jazz, elements. What, then, do you consider their music to be? Brecker, as well as being a fantastic straight ahead jazz player is considered the greatest of the fusion tenor players. Most importantly, I am very interested in why you don't consider Brecker a fusion player; after all Rok said he was and nothing more :-)
More to discover