The Ten Rules of high-end audio


1. Room acoustics can make up to 50% of the final sound.
2. With cables you can only "tune" the sound: they don't make a flawed system sounding good.
3. Tweaks can change a system's sound, but a different sound doesn't have to mean that there is better sound.
4. System synergy is not brand dependent. It has a weak relation with the costs of the individual components. It has also a weak relation with the technical design of the components (for example tube or solid state amplification, cone based or ribbon speakers).
5. It is better to have a good front end (where music reproduction begins) than to have very good speakers but only so so front end.
6. The importance of a clean AC power shouldn't be underestimated.
7. It is more worthwhile to invest in electronics and/or acoustics than in so called "tweaks".
8. It is better to strive for a "balanced" sound with some comprimizes than to strive for a "perfect" sound by frequently mixing and matching things. This way you will likely end up with a less satisfying sound.
9. Older high end components are not inferior to more contemporary units by definition. Some older units sound even better (= more musical) than the newer ones. This is also true with newer iterations of the same basic concept (Mk II, III, IV, etc).
10. When you are building up a high end system (or replacing units in your system) you should ask yourself two questions: What are the goals I'm striving for? What can I expect sonically from the component(s) I'm purchasing?

Comments please!

Chris
dazzdax
Linn Sondek argues that their LP12 hooked up to a pair of Campbells soup cans will sound better than the Wilson/Denon combo.
Linn LP12 awwwwwwww back in the day, Asaks and Ittoks. Brings a tear to a glass eye.
There was one UK hi-fi bod who could apparently at a hi-fi show tell you if an LP12 was playing without looking at the turntable.
London and Curries! no need to go to India. Islington, N1!
joeylawn, I think this was at a trade show. I think people were impressed with the sound and then surprised when seen what was driving the Wilson's. Note that Wilson's I've heard are not all that revealing, esp. in the HF, have some innate colorations, and are easy to drive.

I have Ken Kessler's review of the newer Denon UD-M31:

"after 20 seconds of listening he just shook his head. He thought I was driving the Gaurneris with L10,000 of tubed McIntosh or the Musical Fidelity Tri-Vista"
Gawdbless

London curry is definitely reference quality.

But British "hi fi" never convinced me.

cwlondon