Do new NOS tubes need break-in/running-in?


I have bought a few Mullard ECC88 NOS tubes and to my lousy ears, found no sonic differences between these and my current Amperex ECC88. Quads were used in my ARC LS-16 preamp.

If there is such a thing as break-in for tubes, will NOS tubes sound any different and/or better after break-in? If break-in is required for NOS tubes, what is the rough estimate for break-in period?

I have a strong feeling that I won't be able to get significant sound improvements/differences after prolonged listening hours. Maybe my preamp is not too susceptible to different tubes?

Any opinions or advice would be much appreciated.
ryder
I am little relieved after reading the post by Majicjazz. At least now I know the ARC preamp will be quite receptive towards tube rolling.

Thanks for the comprehensive post Jbaxley. I will see if I have time to check on the etched codes on the Mullards this weekend as it requires a bit of work to unplug everything and get the piece out from the shelf. Hopefully they are not the same Amperex tubes as I paid quite a bit for the NOS.
It is a P.I.T.A. to open the preamp, but while you're at it, you may find it interesting to try to decipher all of the codes. So here's how to read the rest of the codes. In the second row, there are usually 4 characters, which signify as follows, in this order: [factory code][year of production][month][week]. So, "*3A4" would mean made at Amperex Hicksville factory, in the 4th week of January 1963 -- a nice vintage!

The codes on the first line stand for [tube type] and [??]. "VR" means a 6DJ8 type (i.e., a 6DJ8, ECC88, 6922, E88CC, 7308, or E188CC). The significance of the last number is murkier - it seems so signify the number of the batch or production run. Whatever it means, the lower the number, the older the tube. So VR4 is older than VR6.

Tubes made at the Hicksville factory were just about always branded Amperex and tubes from Blackburn were almost always branded Mullard. But the Heerlen factory pumped out a lot of (excellent) tubes and they could have been branded Philips, Amperex, Mullard, or Valvo. The Valvos usually sell for a little less; I'm not sure why, but the Valvo name is less prestigious and some assume that a Valvo was made at Valvo's German factory (not as good, imho). But if the factory code indicates Heerlen, well, a Heerlen tube is a Heerlen tube. The brand name means nothing. They're excellent.

The good news is that, even if your tubes were made at the same factory, they're all good, just different flavors, and you would have two nice sets of tubes. 'Can't have too many toobs. (But take that with a grain of salt -- your writer has a drawer full of these -- which is what led me to research and get to know the coding.) Happy decoding, James
There's not a tube on the planet that needs 200 hours to break-in.

Perhaps the listener is acclimating to the new sonics as he hears familar software with different tubes.
Bill is right. Tubes require less break-in than just about any other electronic device because they have *literally* a vacuum as their primary dielectric.

The concept of "break-in" is really a convenient name for the process of forming the dielectric or insulation layer around a conductor or conductive element.

Part of what makes tubes sound so great and break in so quickly is that there is no insulator surrounding the conductive elements- not even air!