Great systems in butt-ugly rooms


I know I'm not the only one thinking this, but there are
some ass ugly rooms housing some of these great systems.
We may have great ears, but we have no sense when it comes
to making our rooms look good, with a few exceptions, of course. Any comments?
JP
jorgeparrapuppy
Personally, the visual esthetics are as important to me

I have always been happy with somewhere to stick my gear never mind aesthetics. If you are too fussy then you miss out on a lot of fun.
Fussy people like fussy. Fussy is fun for fussy people.
Fussy is not fun for non-fussy people. There, I guess that about covers all of it!
Puerto

High end audio is extremely "fussy".

So I guess you are in the looks matter camp.

Cwlondon
04-23-08: Ckoffend
I think more than the appearance of the room, which for some in a dedicated room is not as important, is the number of systems in these tiny little rooms. I have seen some systems with upwards of $25,000 - $50,000 worth of equipment in rooms that don't appear to be more than 8-10 feet wide. Some of these systems are running large, very large speakers that appear to be about 1 foot from the side walls and about 4 feet apart.

Personally I think speakers with 1 foot clear distance from side walls are not a good thing even with some serious acoustical treatments. My room is 11' wide and although I have treatments at both side walls, my speakers performed better with a clear distance of 2' from side walls as opposed to 1.5'.

I do agree that we all have compromises of some degree on room shapes and sizes, and some do ignore the match between the system(speakers) and the room. Room treatments can only help to a certain level and for optimum results it is really important to choose the right size of equipment particularly the speakers for the available space.
Fussy people like fussy. Fussy is fun for fussy people.

Perhaps fun is the wrong word....think of all the pleasure a man can still get from sticking his equipment in a butt ugly space.