Just to explain my self on MY opinion:
When I was upgrading from my KST100, I compared the KSA150 to the KSA250. My vote went to the 250, not for the power, but that it sounded less grainy. At the time, I was using one amp to drive double Cello Amatis. I later changed to the B&W800's.
It was on the B&W800's that I personally compared the KSA250 to the KSA300S to the FPB300.
With the aid of the Krell KBX active x-over, I now use the KSA300S for my bass and the FPB300 for the mid/highs on my actively biamped B&W800's.
I am not suggesting that "drum" should scrap his amp, but I would suggest not spending large amounts of money on the preamp, because the improvement would be more significant if spent on the amp.
Richard
When I was upgrading from my KST100, I compared the KSA150 to the KSA250. My vote went to the 250, not for the power, but that it sounded less grainy. At the time, I was using one amp to drive double Cello Amatis. I later changed to the B&W800's.
It was on the B&W800's that I personally compared the KSA250 to the KSA300S to the FPB300.
With the aid of the Krell KBX active x-over, I now use the KSA300S for my bass and the FPB300 for the mid/highs on my actively biamped B&W800's.
I am not suggesting that "drum" should scrap his amp, but I would suggest not spending large amounts of money on the preamp, because the improvement would be more significant if spent on the amp.
Richard