I use a Sumo Polaris 310 the early model. The two following models really sound different to me. The one I have to me sounds like a rowland model 1 that I compared it to for a few weeks but with a very slight more liveliness. That is quite good company. Sumo actually had their pre amp with a passive mode so it works well. It has 47k input imp. and a 1.27 input sens. This amp is twenty years old used on average 12 hrs a week. Never had problem with it. But may be hard to find being that old. The 2 following models were redesigned by someone other than the original designer Rich May. So those are really a different sound, a bit bright imo. From what I hear though some day it would fun to try a proper tube amp. I have had tube amps, arc classic 60 and arc vt70, in the past but not with the LS. The sumo when it comes up seems to be asking about 300..I don't know if he still does, Mike Bettinger use to fix and rebuild sumo and gas gear. I understand he did a great job.
Amp for lightspeed attenuator? = $1000 used
I recently bought a lightspeed attenuator from the classifieds. It's very clear. However, my current amp has an input impedance of about 10K and the lightspeed recs seem much higher than that. I'm curious how much difference there is if I do what I'm supposed to.
Does anyone have recs for 2-channel (or monoblock) amps that are known to play nice with this passive? Ideally $1000 or less used.
Thanks!
Does anyone have recs for 2-channel (or monoblock) amps that are known to play nice with this passive? Ideally $1000 or less used.
Thanks!
- ...
- 18 posts total
- 18 posts total