Amp for lightspeed attenuator? = $1000 used


I recently bought a lightspeed attenuator from the classifieds. It's very clear. However, my current amp has an input impedance of about 10K and the lightspeed recs seem much higher than that. I'm curious how much difference there is if I do what I'm supposed to.

Does anyone have recs for 2-channel (or monoblock) amps that are known to play nice with this passive? Ideally $1000 or less used.

Thanks!
dddrrreee
Thanks for all the amp pointers!

I'm having a hard time tracking down the older recommendations. Does anyone have experience with Muse 150s or with marantz ma-700 monoblocks?

Again, I need something ideally that is more than 100W @ 8ohm.
George: the burson 160 is still for sale. Would that work as well as the 100?

http://www.frontendaudio.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=9999-11288&click=18920
Dddrrreee: trouble is the xdac is a tube ouput stage buffer you will be back in the same boat trying to drive your 10k amp and ?k two times active subs from it. It needs to be a solid state buffer. with 100ohms or less output impedance.

Cheers George
Thanks George. Since you recommended the burson-100, did you have any thoughts on the burson ab-160? The specs look as you suggest:

http://www.partsconnexion.com/burson/ab-160.html

Input impedance: 500 KOhms
Frequency response: 1Hz (-0.3dB) to 35 kHz (-1dB)
Signal to noise ratio: >120dB at 0dB gain
Output impedance: line out 15 Ohms @ line level
Power dissipation: >10W, internal, regulated power supply
Maximum Output Voltage :12VRMS
Maximum Input Voltage: 6VRMS
Yes, the Burson AB-160 will work just as well. It's just the newer (and ostensibly better) version of the old Burson 100 buffer.