Amps I Like

Wow, a lot happened since my last post.
@erik_squires ,
Thanks for the great description of the two amps.
I agree, Ayre has a certain 'something', and I believe Ralph is correct in naming the Zero Feedback circuitry as being implicit for that sound quality. 
It seems I must have a thing for Zero Feedback as I own both the Ayre MX-R's and MA-1's. I never thought I was going to take things this far, but all the great advice from fellow Audiogoners brought me to my current state.
I am waiting for Ralph to introduce his Class D amp. Given his past accomplishments, I can see this future product will give the other Class D manufacturers a real shock.
Bob

Good thread. 

Can you describe what you like about ARC with comparable level of detail to your Ayre description?  Serious request, thanks!  Enjoyable to read

Hi @kren0006

I wouldn’t call the ARC the equal of the Ayre. I would call the ARC a very good integrated, one I could probably live with very happily.


I won’t wax effusively on it because my time with it was short. I would call the ARC a really great exemplar of what modern tubes can do, without sounding overly juicy, overly dark, or overly sterile.


Like a lot of other ARC products right now, the ARC integrated has the modern ARC sound. Extended, no longer as cool or sterile as old ARC (yeah, i said it, come get me) with the frequency extension and power. Easy to listen to and easy to get into the music’s ebb and flow


It may be too "middle of the road" for some, but I heard it with some medmium sized Wilsons and it was really good. Sasha’s maybe?? For the cost, size and easy of living with it is a very good integrated. If you like the modern ARC sound, and want a relatively small single unit to put in with no fuss, at a relatively low price point, it’s a great choice, IMHO.

Like everything, please listen for yourself!! :) Come back after listening and tell me I’m wrong. :)



Best,

Erik

"Debussy understood that a work of art
Or an effort to create beauty, was
Always regarded by some people as a personal attack."

AG @ it's worse reminds me of this....@ it's best, a great place to exchange our thoughts and opinions with resorting to rancor or MHO>YHO....

Hi, Erik. *S*  I think I'll just lurk. ^5's.

Interesting. It sounds like you prefer modern ARC to historical ARC, and that you think ARC house sound (if I can call it that) has changed for the better over a number of years but to your ears is not (at least the integrated amp) quite on par with Ayre.  I say ‘interesting’ because if anything some of what I’ve read on this site seems to lament ARCs direction and pine for the good old days there. But maybe that’s more as to service and old favorite employee departures than to sound quality. 

I’m too new to the game to have a longer term point of reference, just trying to learn from those with experience and well formed opinions. I’m personally quite interested in ARC because I own a circa 2010 solid state ARC integrated (class D even - wow that’s way out on the ARC property fringes) and really like it. I got it as a demo unit on major sale while demoing a ton of speakers (didn’t have time/energy to put same level of effort into amp selection - it sounded great to me with the speakers I chose so that was good enough for me), and I knew from my last buying experience 20 yrs ago that ARC and Mc were two of biggest and well respected brands, and finally ARC was local to me so some regional pride in going with them I guess. It was kinda like, I can get ARC for this price? Done, back to focusing on speakers in my search. And I’m happy but probably don’t know what I’m missing if anything. 

I guess in some ways different animals since ARC mainly tubes and Ayre mainly SS, from what I can tell. I think Luxman also in the latter camp and you’ve listened to Lux more, pls share your thoughts on how Ayre and Luxman compare to your ears. Thanks