Aurender N100H or Auralic Aries?

@jon2020 , I also own a non-MQA DAC and did not hear any degration in sound quality on red book recordings. Have you reached out to Aurender support for a possible explanation? 

@falconquest, I only heard Aries demo's at shows and to my ears, N100H sounded more neutral and relaxed which is a huge plus on prolonged listening sessions. No listening fatigue with Aurender. 

My apologies for getting the MQA part wrong as pointed out to me in another forum.

As for the sound degradation, there is really nothing wrong with my unit. I won't send it back for anything. It sounds really, really, really gorgeous once I roll back to the older version. 

:)

Auralic! I compared both and I liked the Aries better and purchased it. I think the cache in the aurender is a gimmick. You don't need a cache that big unless you want to store hundreds of albums which is unrealistic. 
Plus with the Aries, I used both the ds lightning and the lumin iPad software to control my music.
the Aries has 4G of cache which is enough to hold 6 or more cds.

Aurrender 100h  for one you gave a class leading 120 Gig solid state buffer 
No other has one even close at this price point , as well as a 2 Terabyte internal hard drive.  Meaning you can  put in Q for example 40 cds at a time on the 
120Gig AS buffer ,No moving parts ,No spinning No noise,also 
The Conductor app is very organized and allows you to update 
Even help if you have a problem your system can be checked remotely. 
It is built very heavy duty the -  100H is 3x heavier metal not plastic.

Thanks for all the comparisons, that really helps. I will be purchasing either one sight unseen so any information is good information.