Can you tell the difference between a $200 and a $200,000 guitar?


Can you tell the difference between a $200, $2,000, $20,000, and $200,000 classical guitar? Direct comparison starts at 27:39.

 

Linky

128x128noromance

A  Stratavarius violin can sell for millions. A ‘50s Fender Strat in pristine condition can sell for half a million. Surely, these both are priced for their rarity. But also surely both produce amazingly, uniquely wonderful tone.

I have been a professional singer/songwriter for over 50 years accompanying myself on steel string acoustic guitar. Having owned many guitars, I currently play 2. A 1937 Gibson LOO and a fabulous slope shoulder dreadnaught that was custom made for me by a brilliant local luthier. Here in Portland, OR we a fortunate to have several nationally recognized great luthiers. Mine, Kerry Char, being familiar with my music and style, took a full year to design and build a very special instrument just for me. It is not 80+ years old like my Gibson but uses very special and rare 100 year old Brazilian rosewood (the king of tone woods) back and sides and beautiful and rare Alpine spruce for the top. 

I think of my Char guitar as priceless. In the high end acoustic guitar market, it would be priced in the $40-50K range. Beauty of tone of guitars in this range is generally superb. You do get what you pay for. For serious players, the difference is profound and clear.
However, the Stratavarius of acoustic guitars are mid 1930s Martins. I have seen these go for up to a half million. The work of the luthiers and their processes at Martin at that time are unsurpassed. Of course, rarity and collectibility greatly dictate value. But like a great old violin, age has a magical effect on the woods.

The tone of these old Martins is magic. The less rare ones can be found for around the price of those high end new ones. My ‘37 Gibson, while not up to the build of the ‘30 Martins, also has a unique and lovely tone. But I mostly play my modern Char. Its tone is bell-like and beautiful. I did have an amazing 1945 Martin. Keeping it in the family, I gifted it to my talented granddaughter. It has much of the ‘30s Martin magic. She deserves it more than I. These beautiful instruments become personal and precious.

@soix @garebear As a fellow drummer, I found that the type of wood really makes a difference only in the studio setting. I find that the hoops and the heads make the most difference and when you're playing live and Amplified setting the type of wood really makes no difference at all, especially to an audience. Now, when I'm playing an acoustic jazz gig, then yes I find it does make a difference just in terms of projection and tonality.

@mglik 

If one must have a Brazilian + European spruce guitar, it's bound to be very expensive. 

Plenty of top guitarists "make do" with less stratospherically priced tonewood combinations and plenty of them play guitars that sell for under 15K. We are, after all,  living in a golden age of guitar-building. 

 

 

 

“Just play the guitar you like” is my take on it.  
The benefit-coat ratio of a multi-$k purchase for a guitar is always debatable, but, again, it’s about playing the guitar you like as long as such a purchase doesn’t completely torpedo your finances.
I’ve played too many guitars, listened to too many recordings and performances of either “cheap” guitars (that sound great and are used for brilliant performances/recordings) or expensive guitars (that sound bad) to equate high price with good music.

Some great comments here. Wonderful to have so many knowledgeable and talented audiophiles on the forum.