The AA capitole MKII SE is vastly superior to the CARY in either output. The Cary can sound very clinical in SS and definitely sounds better in tube output mode but it really is no match for the AA player which can sound much better if using the Symposium Rollerblocks series 2+ in double stacked configuration with the grade 3 tungsten superballs or the SRA Ohio XL base as an alternative. Only downside in the AA player is that it takes over 1000 hours to fully break in and it sounds best when left turned on all the time. One session with the Capitole and I knew it was the one! ... never replaced it!
Cary 303/300 vs. Audio Aero Capitole CDP
I have been considering auditioning tube CDP's, as much of my music collection is poor quality 70's/80's rock recordings.
I was thinking that tubes at the source may help smooth out some of the harshness that forces me to only want to listen to many of my cd's in the car.
On my audition list has been the AA Capitole, as it seems to be very highly praised.
However, new to the arena is the new Cary, which offers both tube & SS output stages, as well as selectable sampling rates. This one-chasis flexibility seems very attractive to me.
I was wondering if anyone has compared the Cary to any of the different versions of the Capitole CDP?
Any shared experiences would be greatly appreciated.
I was thinking that tubes at the source may help smooth out some of the harshness that forces me to only want to listen to many of my cd's in the car.
On my audition list has been the AA Capitole, as it seems to be very highly praised.
However, new to the arena is the new Cary, which offers both tube & SS output stages, as well as selectable sampling rates. This one-chasis flexibility seems very attractive to me.
I was wondering if anyone has compared the Cary to any of the different versions of the Capitole CDP?
Any shared experiences would be greatly appreciated.
- ...
- 7 posts total
- 7 posts total