This is a bad question.
There are so many factors that go into this.
Number one is whether or not the recording engineer(s) got it right in the first place, or if the recording is historic and relying on outdated recording technology, digital or not. Garbage in, garbage out.
Then, is the source digital or analog? Is the mastering digital or analog? There was a period of time when there was labeling on the CD or LP that addressed this:
AAA
ADD
DDD
DDA
So, you can get an LP that was recorded and mastered digitally. That was thought to be good. Some systems - mine, for example - reveal an audible difference between an LP that is DDA and is AAA. On my system, DDA sounds thin and lacking in timber and atmospherics.
There are so many factors that go into this.
Number one is whether or not the recording engineer(s) got it right in the first place, or if the recording is historic and relying on outdated recording technology, digital or not. Garbage in, garbage out.
Then, is the source digital or analog? Is the mastering digital or analog? There was a period of time when there was labeling on the CD or LP that addressed this:
AAA
ADD
DDD
DDA
So, you can get an LP that was recorded and mastered digitally. That was thought to be good. Some systems - mine, for example - reveal an audible difference between an LP that is DDA and is AAA. On my system, DDA sounds thin and lacking in timber and atmospherics.