There is two kind of audiophiles at the two extreme limits...
We dont have the same budget...
Those with no budget limit...
Those with a strict budget limit...
Audiophile experience ask not only for much time to create it but in my case acoustic knowledge ...
I am on a strict buget...
Someone with no limit budget will put emphasis on the gear design and price... Generally the priciest, the better ... ( they are exception as mike lavigne dedicated room ). It is easier to buy than to experiment with a necessary big amount of time...
For most people with a strict budget i cannot imagine a real audiophile experience without emphasis put on mechanical, electrical and acoustical controls... And you cannot afford it without experiments if you are on a low budget ...Costlier upgrades are out of choices..
The good fortune of being without unlimited budget was that i was absolutely in the obligation to learn the essentials and experiment : Acoustics was, i discovered it ,the main factor of audiophile experience not price tag... I completely ignore that 12 years ago as most ...
Here people with an unlimited budget but a limited judgment will attack me to say that i advocate a falsehood: that gear design dont matter... This is false , i could bought better gear design for my speakers system if i could afford it easily, gear design quality matters ...
But my audiophile experience became so good with low cost speakers (modified for sure) that i feel lucky... No frustration and a S.Q. with a low cost ratio impossible to beat...if i can afford better speakers than those i own now in a real acoustic room as i had one year ago , for sure i will improve it ...
i wrote my piece for people with low budget.... learn about electrical, mechanical and especially acoustical control... The main stopgap in audio is a lack of knowledge and a lack of acoustics experiments way more than the gear price tags ...