Did your system getting better the more money you spent or more experience you gained?


This is something that wanted to ask folks. Initially I said I would never spend x amount of dollars in this audio journey. 20 years later I’m here and did what I said I wouldn’t but I’m happier than ever. Best system to this date. But it wasn’t about money only. I gained knowledge on what was possible and the quality and design of the gear I wanted. I see people just throw money into audio and never be happy or satisfied. I think that happens because they don’t think for themselves as well as have the resources? Thoughts ?

calvinj

It is both. It took me some money to determine what I like / trying to achieve. Then through reading, listening, think I had to spend less to get close to my goal.  

Great responses. I think l got to a point where I tried to learn as much as possible then I ramped the spending up more. I was extremely careful with the last 2 purchases. The Infigo method 4 & 6.  But I got to demo first and that was the key. Trying before I buy.  I was able to go amp source cables one company and it worked extremely well!  But you can’t just spend a lot of money and get it right based on cost. 

Anyone who has watching Danny Richie from GR-Research has seen first hand that spending more money on audio does NOT ALWAYS equal better performance or even better parts.

I think it’s naive to think that it does, but it is a natural inclination to think that way because often times spending more money DOES bring better performance. Having said that, there are many factors which would contribute to better sound with synergy being one, individual hearing ability as well as having a trained ear as two more, the "I got more expensive new gear so it must be better" factor being another and so may others etc, etc.

I think experience would be the far more important factor as well as knowing one’s self. Taste in sound is another important factor and so is the degree of arrogance or objectivity and open-mindedness (internally) one has to recognize when listening to gear.

There is two kind of audiophiles at the two extreme limits...

We dont have the same budget...

Those with no budget limit...

Those with a strict budget limit...

 

Audiophile experience ask not only  for much time to create it but in my case acoustic knowledge ...

I am on a strict buget...

Someone with no limit budget will put emphasis on the gear design and price... Generally the priciest, the better ... ( they are exception as mike lavigne dedicated room ). It is easier to buy than to experiment with a necessary  big amount of time...

For most people with a strict budget i cannot imagine a real audiophile experience without emphasis put on mechanical, electrical and acoustical controls... And you cannot afford it without experiments  if you are on a low budget ...Costlier upgrades are out of choices..

The good fortune of being without unlimited budget was that i was absolutely in the obligation to learn the essentials and experiment : Acoustics was, i discovered it ,the main factor of audiophile experience not price tag... I completely ignore that 12 years ago as most ...

Here people with an unlimited budget but a limited judgment will attack me to say that i advocate a falsehood:  that  gear design dont matter... This is false , i could bought better gear design for my speakers system if i could afford it easily, gear design quality matters  ...

But my audiophile experience became  so good with low cost speakers (modified for sure) that i feel lucky... No frustration and a S.Q. with a low cost ratio impossible to beat...if i can afford better speakers  than those i own now in a real acoustic room as i had one year ago , for sure i will improve it ...

i wrote my piece for people with low budget.... learn about electrical, mechanical and especially acoustical control... The main stopgap in audio is a lack of knowledge and a lack of acoustics experiments way more than the gear price tags ...