Dynavector 10X5 , 20XH, or, other

OK, I know, I know. The 17 is the right choice for me and really the one I want. If overnite they magically came out with a high output version, I would go for it immediately. But, I am trying to keep from having to add a step up, cables, etc. I find that even running my phono preamp through the line stage mucks up the sound not to mention extra cables, etc. I doubt if I could be satisfied with a low priced step up transformer. Thanks Ejlif and Kmulky for your comments.

I had both. The 20x I think is clearly better. To me it simply sounds like a better 10x5. Before I read you whole post I was already thinking to recommend the 17D. That is where the performance takes a big leap. That cartridge sounds so good for the money, biggest bang for the buck I've had a chance to hear. I also have the XX-2 and I think it is better than the 17Dmk 2 but there are aspects of the 17D that better it and even maybe better the Shelter 90X to some degree. I've also heard a few Grados and they seem like a big letdown compared to the Dynavector stuff.

+1 on the 17D3. It was a night and day difference from the 10X5 which is what I bought my Scout with.

I had both. The 20x I think is clearly better. To me it simply sounds like a better 10x5. Before I read you whole post I was already thinking to recommend the 17D. That is where the performance takes a big leap. That cartridge sounds so good for the money, biggest bang for the buck I've had a chance to hear. I also have the XX-2 and I think it is better than the 17Dmk 2 but there are aspects of the 17D that better it and even maybe better the Shelter 90X to some degree. I've also heard a few Grados and they seem like a big letdown compared to the Dynavector stuff.