Hardware or source materail


Hello –

The following is for context.

I am an old guy. I grew up in the days a Mac 225, AR3a, EPI, Phase Linear. I have only recently stopped working full time so I bought the following for my small office listening area, about 12x12.

Debut Carbon/Ortofon Blue

CA AXR100

Denon 600NE

KEF LS50

B&W 8” 300 watt Sub (sealed)

I mostly listen to orchestral, Steely Dan, Miles, Brubeck, Krall, Botti – you get the idea. I also am season holder for LA Phil and Hollywood Bowl so I know what “real” music sounds like.

My little system may not be to everyone’s taste but I find it fills my little space well.

Here is the quandary:

Like most, I am always thinking about the next “upgrade” for improved fidelity. Don’t need loud or to fill big space. However, I just purchased a half-speed (45 RPM) Brubeck and was absolutely astonished at the dynamic range and sound quality. I believe that what it is telling me is that with the right input the hardware I have is maximized.

Obviously, a $7K amp and equally expensive supporting components would be even better. But how much better? Is the investment in better source material a better use of funds? After all, that will always be available if the hardware is improved. You can buy a lot of $60-150 vinyl records (or CDs made from masters) for the 15 to $20K hardware cost.

sbsail9

Probably so. But I posted this on several audio sites and so far, no one has answered the core question. 

It seems to me that everyone is focused on their XYZ 1000 and not on, shall we say, the actual sound. I fully acknowledged in my original post that better hardware would make a difference. 

The question remains: If a $60 vinyl record (vs a $30 mass produced one) has such a huge impact on the audio quality vis a vis the actual sound that I hear, would you not spend your money on more of the high quality source material first? 

Have I touched the third rail of so called Audiophile-ness"

As a septuagenarian music lover who shares your appreciation for jazz, I’ve found that upgrades to components can but don’t always make a significant difference. Not surprised you found the 45 rpm vinyl noticeably better. My suggestion is try auditioning gear in your home in your room. A high quality separate phono stage, a better turntable, arm and cartridge would be at the top of my recommended list of things to audition if you want more detail, and better imaging if you’re really into audiophile vinyl pressings. Your Cambridge Audio and Denon units could also clearly be bettered while staying within your budget. Your system is only as good as its weakest link. Hard to say where to start. Perhaps others more familiar with your CA and Denon units can speak to their limitations and possible upgrades.