Great post! and in constrast with mine with only few words...😁
It would be a better world IF more people with evangelical like certainty about JUST how the ear brain works would approach it with less certainty…..
Those who brag about what science describe as possible and then about what is impossible are often wrong ...
Guess why?
Nature dont obey limited human technological dogmas...We learn from Nature habits, but nature habits are no more "nature" than the habits of someone are a definition of himself.. ( Philospher of Nature is a title dismissed in 1836 by the British society for the advancement of science under Whevell and Babbage tutelage, replacing it by the word "scientist" at the service of his majesty corporate powers and this was prophetized by Goethe Faust part two published three years before the real British "scientists" meeting )
And we dont understand hearing yet by the way ...Only those confusing DSP technology feats with hearing understanding brag about what is true and what is false about sound qualities as perceived ...
A simple example of impossibility for scottwheel :
is a man can for hours lay in a fire without being affected ?
Answer scottwheel please when patronizing us about science ... 😊
Listen to this and debunk it for us poor superstitous audiophiles ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXfyrWRbmss
By the way instead of patronizing people about what they must hear and cannot hear... Why instead speaking about the BACCH filters a true acoustic revolution unrecognized yet by most audiophiles especially if unlike me you own one😁 ... Stirring a controversial pot is useless, speaking about an acoustic revolution would be more useful ...