“Again, what’s with the insinuation?”
There was no insinuation. It was pretty direct. If you feel insulted by assertions of fact that is your problem.
“Is it because you didn’t understand what I wrote?”
I understood what you wrote.
“The use of "obviously delusional claims" was a paraphrasing of your outlandish examples of what you say members claim and you’re conflating that with what they say they’re hearing. The two are not anywhere near the same.”
complete nonsense. I have never claimed or inferred that anyone here is delusional. So you weren’t “paraphrasing” anything I actually said. And when you accuse someone of making delusional claims it follows that the person making the claim is delusional.
“It was not calling you delusional. One (yours) is made up and the other (members hearing acuity) is based in reality.”
Im stating facts about human hearing. We can go back and forth all day on this. If you want to put it to an actual test I’m all for it.
“You’re not as clever as you think you are. That line from the Princess Bride comes to mind....whatever.”
it is once again ironic that you would try to make this about me on a thread lamenting civility. I’d be more than happy to put this “difference of opinion” to an actual test and we can record it and post it. Let’s make it about audio and let’s do more than just talk.
