Help me pick a Dynaudio


So I went to this store in middle-of-nowhere rural Japan today, and they had some amazing speakers (new and used).

I went to listen to the Confidence C1 Platinums and the KEF Reference 1s. I ended up liking the Confidence C1s a lot more. Maybe it’s because I’ve been using the Dynaudio Contour 1.1s for so long I’ve just become used to their sound, but I wasn’t really drawn the the KEFs (though they were clearly a great speaker in general).

After listening to the C1s, I listened to the Focus 340s. They're selling the floor model for cheap:
http://sound-support.jp/14537.html

I could tell that the sound wasn’t as "pure" as the Confidence 1 C1 Platinums, but there was something I really liked about them. I’m not a basehead at all, but there was something really relaxed and comforting about the sound of the 340s that really drew me. And the floor model for $4,000 seems like a good deal.

One more possibility: They also have a used set of Sapphires for about $10,000, or the same price as the C1s. Only, I can’t audition them. There’s only one guy there, and he says they just don’t have the staff to audition used merchandise. This doesn’t really make sense, since he let me audition everything else, but I’ve long since learned that it’s pointless to try to argue with Japanese people about following rules.

I would be using the speakers in a relatively small room: about 14 X 18 feet.

So, I really can’t make up my mind. I was ready to spend 10K on the C1s, but unexpectedly liked the full-size 340s. I’ve never had a full-sized speaker before. But if I really liked the 340, I can’t help but think that the Sapphire would be just incredible. If only they would let me audition it!

Sorry for rambling. ;)

Any input would be appreciated. Anybody familiar with the Sapphire and either the 340 or the C1s, and could provide some meaningful comparisons?

(I'll be driving all these with a Krell 300 KAVi, listening to mostly acoustic/classical music at moderate volumes.)


zachawry
...C2 will be good for that shape of room....by my humble opinion more valid question is "are C2s deserve more powerful and most important more quality amplification than you currently own?"...wouldnt be better to invest in a higher level amp to mate it with C1s and get them to a clearly another level for the difference you would invest in C2s...or have averagely sounding C2 with your Krell...you will get more deeper bass, higher and bigger soundstage with C2s but fundamental refinment in sound of Confidence series will get you only a higher level equipment in the rest of the chain...not to say your amp is bad or something...
@raindog031 How are you? Been a while. Anyhow I have to agree 100% with you regarding the SQ of the different Dyn's. As far as the C2's in the OP's room I would question which wall they would be on. If the 18' wall there shouldn't be any problem except for the taller vertical soundstage if that would even be a problem (for me it was - I don't care for the tall soundstage). On the 14' wall they could be a bit much without a lot of room treatments especially in the low end. My room is 26' X 14' and I had the C2's on my 26' wall and the extra low end was everywhere except in the 'sweet spot'. 14' wall for me is not an option - bummer.

@keithr The C2 is still considered a 2 way not 2.5 per the Dyn reps in the states. I will agree that the C1 with a good sub will perform similar to C2's without the taller soundstage. I have a Rel B3 and used it only to add to what the C1's couldn't do. A match made in heaven IMO especially for the money.

Dyn's especially the confidence series are world class speakers. You will have to spend boatloads more gold bars to get better IMO.

Good luck whatever you finally decide
I have always preferred a monitor + sub bass system over a full range speaker.  I feel the monitor/sub images (soundstage) better when properly integrated together.