Thank you for the tips. I guess I thought it would be an easier task like posting pics of my system. I will look into the you tube side.
Regards
Ron
That's easy. It's either or both of the following: 1. You have a preference for lossy, compressed recordings. That is not at all uncommon - many prefer the SQ of sources such as Spotify and YouTube, which are inherently compromised by design so as to limit file size. 2. You're watching a video of an audio system, so what you see influences what you think you hear, a/k/a "confirmation bias." |
@cleeds It is obvious that you have not listened to the audio recordings of my systems. The biggest takeaway from listening to them is the inner detail, low level detail, nuance, and resolution of the system’s sound qualities. I have highly resolving systems and that comes through in the audio recordings. When I listen to the audio recordings embedded on videos I’m listening to the sound. If you notice, the image on the video doesn’t change throughout the recording and it isn’t all that interesting once you seen it. You seem to be argumentative without any logic or substance. I support and back up my point of view by submitting audio recordings of my systems. You want to just be a contrarian for the hell of it. Why don’t you tell us about your system and how it sounds, and contribute something constructive for a change! |
I understand that’s what you hear. I don’t dispute that at all.
You’re watching a video so what you see can influence what you think you hear. That’s "expectation bias" and it’s silly for you to think you’re absolutely immune.
YouTube is lossy - dynamically compressed, limited in high frequencies, and lacking in resolution. I understand if you think that's not substantive, but you'll have to accept that others think differently.
I have thousands of posts on A’gon. Please feel free to familiarize yourself. |