2. home-theater
  3. 1127192094

Hybrid system with separates vs. receiver

Currently I have a McCormack DNA 1 amplifier and the McCormack TLC 1 passive preamp. I am thinking about buying the Arcam Avr300 for surround sound, while keeping the McCormack for dedicated 2 channel listening. Using the preamp as a pass through, I will have the McCormack power the fronts and sub and the Arcam power up the rears and center channel. Is this a good approach? Or do you think the receiver should power the whole system? I only have one room for theatre/stereo.

Front Speakers -- Magnepan 1.6's. Room size -- 11 x 15
dgplo
steuspeed's avatar
steuspeed
501 posts
 
How about a McCormack DNA HT3 and a processor of your choice? If that does not fit your budget you could use McCormack Micro Drive amps. One for the surround channels and another one can be switched to bridge mode for the center channel. Just add more Micro drives as your system expands to more surround channels. Way cool man!!!
stereo
147 posts
 
The AVR300's amps are very good sounding. If you try the set-up as you explained above, then compare it to the AVR300's internal amps. You may find yourself selling the McCormack and using only the AVR300. I speak from experience. I thoroughly enjoy my AVR300.
dgplo OP
76 posts
 
I will definitley a/b the two systems...I'm hoping the Arcam sounds good as a stand alone piece, it will certainly uncomplicate the signal path...

What I really should look at is the McCormack preamp that has the dedicated theatre pass through built in...but it is costly, about 1800.
maineiac
649 posts
 
I have a similar set-up with an integrated amp with a HT pass through and a receiver driving everything else. Works extremely well - no hassle and great sound for either application.
dgplo OP
76 posts
 
which integrated did you buy? i believe the musical fidelty 3.5 and 5.0 have this feature.
More to discover